SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Assumptions

Socialist Action No. 10, 20 May 1983 · p. 9 of the scan · 159 words

The scan: 010-may-20-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-2 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

benefits; justifying keeping wages at a low level and the idea that women do not need to go out to work since men are the bread-winners.

Likewise it informs aspects of the labour movement's policy. For example, the local authority unions' claim to the Clegg Commission after the Winter of Discontent used in negotiations the fact that almost half their full time workers earned less take home pay than a typical family on social security. & By using the family in this way as a comparative yardstick for the purposes of The weakness of therefore lies not only in its fundamental assumptions. In the context of the economic crisis of the '80s the progressive measure supports ecome utopian without going transformation of the economy putting social nead before profit. contradiction is nowhere more evident than in the policies and programme advanced by the manifesto The New Hope. Beveridgism have a thorough This Party's Thatcher - double values

← The Tory for the fMarxism and the family →

Something wrong on this page?