SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Disunity

Socialist Action No. 102, 17 May 1985 · pp. 10-11 of the scan · 184 words

The scan: 102-may-17-1985-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

To date the determination of the London TransDistrict Council the NUR to fight job loss nas carrica mue nanonal ex' ecutive of the union with There can be no doubt that the majority of the ranks of ASLEF and the NUR are totally opposed lo uro ana tne rest ol trie job cuts. But the growing leaderships has steadily strengthening hand of those in the union alu WOkec WIll anti-strike.

IL Was this question of unity and how to fight for it that was at the centre of Otherwise its maority will have been a party to useless bureaucratic unity with the leadership of ASLEF at the expense of thousands of jobs.

The situation on the London underground has very severe implications for TASL EF continue British Rail. refusing to oppose OPO drivers could well sign up for it when it is introduced.

Then it will be crunch time for ASLEF ecutive. Will they instruct their members picket lines or leave then to individually choose betwcet an extra +30 a week or victimisation by management?

page 11 of the scan

Socialist Action 17 May 1985

← LT union leaders pretend it isn't happeningSheffield sets a rate →

Something wrong on this page?