SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Hypocrisy

Socialist Action No. 105, 14 June 1985 · pp. 2-3 of the scan · 264 words

The scan: 105-jun-14-1985-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

meaningless to say that everyone has 'equal opportunity' capital, and acquire property, when some people in reality own and control the means of production, distribution and exchange, and others do not.

Within the labour movement it is also a purely formal, and bourgeois application of 'equal opportunity' stops a political current such as Militant understanding that women and blacks are socially oppressed groups that do HOW CHICH the the workforce, or the lobung to men and walles.

That is why positive action, and positive discrimination is necessary to give women and blacks real equality -not a false formal equality that ignores reality and the effects of centuries of discrimination and oppression. onus is not on blacks and women to 'fit in'. t's the other way round.

Socialist Action 14 June 1985 accumulate movement.

that blems of women The mass the miners' 'equal' The fight for The The be won.

Women

Owen the struggles black such as all demands waged with not for place! insuperable qualifications can the ensure that elected Parliamentary WAC evidence constituency parties all-male sewn up the male canThe cynicism hypocrisy of this position is breathtaking. The collusion of the NEC and its officers this cynicism hypocrisy would not be tolerated by genuinely democratic socialist If our Annual Conference were undemocratic so unrepresentative of the women of our then moves would have been made years ago against the NEC'S the Party's discrimination As it is a Conference in which 90% of those who cast 90% of the votes (the trade union delegations) are

page 3 of the scan

can women win? Preview

← WAC Editorial: Reselection scandalPowell pops up again →

Something wrong on this page?