SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

NUM campaign

Socialist Action No. 110, 2 August 1985 · p. 2 of the scan · 184 words

The scan: 110-aug-02-1985-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

Demolishing each

arguments in stake in the campaign for national unitv. He pointed ing waged by the splitters the issue was not one o •Scargill has never perLoue his policiest my Lynk denies he is in*Spencer emerged in agreements which would basis, reward "loyalty" of Notts. I'm sure that these offers will be honoured in the short term. But the aim is to prevent unity in the NUM to prevent us fighting this •-mafia-type management.

'And I'll predict — and - that if the Tories are re-elected, Notts pits will be owned by the multinationals in five destruction of the NUM.

'It would be a blow not just to the miners, but to movement in Britain.

Ray Chadburn receiveda when he introduced himself as the president of Notts area NUM. He went on to echo the points made by Heathfield phasising in particular collaboration of the NCB in the split.

Chadburn reported that workers at Bevercotes colliery with forms from the time JOEl breakaway. He closed by appealing to Notts miners to 'defend this great union and preserve our nationalised industry.

← Hammond and ScargillFighting →

Something wrong on this page?