SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Coal Board dismissed miner unfairly, says tribunal

Socialist Action No. 116, 4 October 1985 · p. 7 of the scan · 282 words

The scan: 116-oct-04-1985-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

On 19 February DENNIS PENNINGTON, a the Lancashire Court alleged car, which picket The next later as its found in 'British court of Dennis reports board's February, letter of home priso When the colliery Western NCB Mr ing But in June much to the producuon manager. my dismissal appealed The Coal Board called for an adjournment of the heardn cne catetan l cnc third day let them gather further evidence.

One of their main ob.

jections to reinstatemen • ШП as I had beer found guilty by a 'British Court Justice' I was unacceptable to the men ai pit. I'his argument casual ly omits the fact that many vuCo olO ay court, but who had choser W CLurI wOrK beToTE the end of the dispute, still remained 'acceptable their peers.

After six weeks the Inanimous decision that 1 tribunal reatener had been unfairly dismissed. Their full report was an indictment of NCB's reasons for dismissing me. It said tha they had broken accepted aei cehiculs dismissing me because of my imprisonment, news of which was only reaching the management 'on the eta evine The manager wrongly believe that I had been sent down for six months The tribunal is to meet the board on 15 October where it will order reinstatement. The response from the boar far Is a deafenin silence Despite MacGregor's statement in a recent Coal News article. Savilt tha those who thought they had been un fairly dismissed follow accepted legal pro cedures and make plication to an industrial tribunal, many men who ‹have won their appeals still remain on the wrong : side of the pit gates. Whither the coal board's adulation British courts justice now?

← Notts breakaway in trouble"Orgreave, Handsworth, Brixton and vou next" →

Something wrong on this page?