SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

What we stand for pamphlet

Socialist Action No. 12, 3 June 1983 · p. 13 of the scan · 207 words

The scan: 012-jun-03-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 13 of the scan

parties was in 1974 — when 25 per cent of the electorate voted for the Liberals, Nationaists etc the SDP/Liberal Alliance comes near to that will be the real measure of their But what happens to the Alliance the is small beer compared with what happens inside the Labour Party. The ruling class want desperately to do a job on the Labour left, to prepare for a possible future collapse of support for the Tories. At the moment the Labour Party's policies are totally Anacceptable to the ruling class.

No serious section of capitalist opinion pledged to unilateral disarmament, opposed to the EEC and opposed to incomes policy. Ihis means a cam paign to break the Labour Party from these policies Healee mehhanics of dre 1ne mechanics Labour and making it fit for a coalition with the Alliance are already being worked on. For example, wing Labour MP comments in his book The Case for HOT OFF THE PRESS! JUST 25p The policies that Socialist Action stands for in this election and beyond. Send 25p plus 16p postage for your copy to Socialist Action, PO ox 50, London N1 2XP.

Whether Able coalition. cess.

accept a government decline.

impose "re-centering' rightAustin Mitchell And if WE

← By John RossSTAND MARDEN →

Something wrong on this page?