Marks rent of fear of the war danger, reflected in mass opposition cruise and Trident, and also won over some of the Liberal supporters of unilateralism from the alliance.
On 16 Jim Mortimer, speaking at the NUPE conference, Callaghan, whose contribution to the Labour Party consists of losing it an election every four years, made his infamous speech on the bomb. He attacked to policy before a specially invited media audience, saying 'could not fault the tactics of the Western arms negotiators', underwriting Reagan's war drive, and putting himself to the right of policies would lead to socialist leadership that he thus ship wedded to an encouraging workers' away as Warsaw.
factor'. roomful typewriters, the US Congress, which has called for a freeze in defiance of Reagan's quite capable, To leave the field free for Tory Hence scares about Kremlin expansionism reinforces the Tory red-baiting at home, with its claims that Labour's an East European' or 'Bulgarian' society.
A confident and imaginative have replied by defending Solidarnosc, and pointing out how its struggles would have been illegal under Tebbitt's anti-union laws. But a leader'alternative economic assessment' that would end up as an incomes policy, and in by withdrawing hours later.
Iwa.
level-pegging, calls ficers in anti-bureaucratic struggles, even as far Then there is the 'Falklands It is well-known that of monkeys with given all eternity, port: could well end up typing the works of Shakespeare. Denis Healey is no monkey, and given only a fourweek election to play with, he is at least once, of coming up with the truth.
the 'glorying in slaughter' speech. Inept, blundering and treacherous thug that he is, Tory voters in Labour seats which have good Alliance candidates should vote Alliance to get Labour out. It is important that there should still be a believable and democratic left-of-Tory force in parliament towards which by-elections and a future general election can then swing. It is desirable that it should be a sort that can form an effective parliamentary force with right-of-Foot 'The worse Labour does in this election, and the better the Alliance does, the more possible such a desirable coalition of the left (and the dismantling of the Labour party under its present constitution) will become.' Healey found the strain of telling the honest truth too much, restored Labour's cock-up image This remarks But this line in denunciation trom unpopular with voters. report to.
Labour's campaign committee, on the phone calls received at Labour HQ the day after the Healey statement showed supporters and critics , with half the hostile supporters, in- by cluding the predictable retired ofTunbridge Wells.
Labour objectors were mostly exservice pensioners, most of whom withdrew their objections when Socialist Action remarks.
ludese a mephor one Tory included a member of the Reform Group, and the mother of for others, and offered her sup others, and offered her supAll of which shows how strong Labour could be today if it had taken a principled position of opposition to the war at the time. But how much credit can be given to professional politicians who sup port war during war-time, and only take a peace-loving position when there's peace?
Economist The real reason for both Heale!
Kinnock's remarks on the Falklands emerges from the Time report of that Labor: leaders had abandoned any hope c victory, and were concerned simp to jockey for position in the powe struggles to come.
Healey had to notch up som credit for attacking the other sid instead of his own, and Kinnos was keen to rebuild his 'left' imag in the hope the ranks in the const tuencies will forgive him for lar ding us in the mess in the first placa getting Healey deput! leader - and forget that he joined his patron Michael Foot in suppo:ting the Falklands war. That wa when Labour lost the election. A full year before it was called.
Socialist Áction 17 June 1983