SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Reply to New Statesman and New Society

Socialist Action No. 142, 30 May 1986 · p. 3 of the scan · 594 words

The scan: 142-may-30-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

anti-gay, other press.

Tribune, the Society, and the ried pieces 'explaining' reactionary purpose are oppressed by capitalism.

ment elections have been by an open attack by mittee inside the Labour Party.

of why this reactionary bian and Gay Rights. elections has been followed by one of the most determined outpourings of racist, reactionary propaganda ever seen from the Kinnockite Statesman, Guardian have all carblack candidates lost Labour votes. These articles are false factually, and serve a completely providing ammunition for those who aim to roll back the gains inside the Labour Party made by the black community and others who These articles on the local governaccompanied Tribune on the demands of the Women's Action ComSocialist Action is printing an analysis campaign has been started by the Kinnockite press, and carries responses to it by the Black Section and the Labour Campaign for LesTHE FOLLOWING reply to articles in the Statesman Society arguing putting forward black candidates responsible for Labour electoral deteats has been sent by Paul Sharma, member of the Black Section National Committee. DEAR EDITOR, Black candidates win had hoped the myth they liability would have been by the excellent results in Haringey, Lambeth, where black candidates received huge vote of confidence from the electorate.

vere in share of the as almost the Outside with in seats taken years ago to al votes.

gains owed transformation of power on a :en the official jet meeting the ey, won a few "Tower Hamlets three seats ure held by the old tes.

e votes. And in St eran Bethnal Green t Jacob popular ft and right - won a in edition of 16 May is a mischievous corruption of the facts. Black candidates lose the votes of a few racist objectors, but it is clear that these are more than compensated votes the black combeen spectacular in areas where a concerted effort to register voters has taken place coupled with socialist policies for example Hackney Haringey.

Your columnist should have emphasised the fact that eight black candidates Wandsworth did extremely well, with five polling more than their white running mates. Indeed one took a clear London know in tw New Statesman, 16 May 1986 the second Time that is both in ine municipal elections and in 1986. All increased Labour's share of the vote the 1982 results.

Enley Earlsfield, consistent. anything the between partner, Love. that the two Black porters ters more non-vo Labour supt In Granbs Black candid Labour's Dav.

Similarly, acri !

Knowsley, wher elections look lik tendency pros : Councillor Peti black candidates Wandsworth came from the Battersea constituency. This constituency has having Saklatvala, radical to the House Commons. Now black didates Still the local failed com. munity - nearly 1 in 4 of Wandsworth's popula tion is black, but only 1 & of labours can. did on earth can torate place faith in pal equality eq Wandsworth's an To win mo duty to racist myths, them.

Pa La Section

----- pull-quotes -----

rer the past four to the Liberals

rals combined to bour proposal to guard, including

the Liberals by as Now only five of

re councillors still communities, and Liberal challenges

mondsey Factor' is als took Limehouse y didn't stand last

battleground, Labour's , within 1 per cent of the spec

In Merton (otherwise Wimbledon) Labour gained 1 from Conservatives,

Enley Taylor: attracted 180 fewer rotes than his white Labour running mate in Earlsfield ward, Wandsworth - and 112 fewer than the successful Tory

A DRAG ANDREW LUMSDER Yawning in the alsies

his majority by himself from M.

← Why Labour lost in WandsworthWide support for Khan and Scally →

Something wrong on this page?