SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

The case for withdrawal

Socialist Action No. 142, 30 May 1986 · pp. 6-7 of the scan · 147 words

The scan: 142-may-30-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

sent British proach, but saw situation.

stitution of direct rule in 1972, partisan approach for stalus qua, by the security apparatus.

IT IS now widely acknowledged that the Labour government which troops to Northern Ireland in 1969 was not acting upon a considered long term policy apitself as taking measures to "keep the lid' on the It was a policy of containment' or 'crisis management'. OCCl From that point on, and with the insuccessive governments have lurched from crisis to crisis, whilst maintaining a bi- been most or le period. It is clear that unless it adopts a clear strategy, a future Labour government would find itself maintaining the guaranteed by direct rule and enforced partition OI with Since partition was imposed upon the Irish people against their wishes expressed in the 1918 elections when 70

page 7 of the scan

economiç, Whilst Socialist Action 30 May 1986

← WHY BRITAIN MUST GEDirect Rule →

Something wrong on this page?