SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

EEC sanctions apartheid

· Socialist Action No. 149, 26 September 1986 · p. 12 of the scan · 378 words

The scan: 149-sep-26-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 12 of the scan

Th manthe .

12 months £15 •verseas (12 months onlv)

Europe E17: Air Mail £24 (Double these rates for multi-reader institutions).

Name..

Address.

Please send me as special offer.

I enclose cheque/PO payable to Socialist Action for f.

Send: Socialist Action Subs, PO Box 50, London NI 2XP 'ecietared ae a newsnaner with the Post fifce Published by Cardinal Enterprises, PO Box 50, London N1. Printed By Laneridge Ltd. (TU), London E2. SUBSCRIPTION OFFER! 13 issues for £3 THE EEC's package of on South Africa were more a case of sanctioning apartheid than imposing real sanctions against the racist After a great deal of hullabaloo, the ComMarket's foreign ministers finally decided merely to halt new in South Africa ban the country's exports of iron steel Krugerrands.

The ban will affect less than five per cent of South Africa's ven ports the Even coal had been included as was predicted, just 15 per cent " of its sales to the bosses market which topped £5.5 billion would have been at stake.

But an alliance of West Germany, CrTLISa ensured that coal was excluded and that the package was kept _to a minimum.

Chancellor Koh and Conicicice following the decision to express their opposition to sanctions in general. Kohl explained that in relation to coal imports not onl did this genci a. DUSILUl apply but in addition 'the fate of many thousands not only of coal miners but their family members' were at stake. Kohi and Thatcher pleading on behalf of miners was just one of the many sickening of their hypo. critical stance.

There was undisguisec relief South Africa's rulers that the package was So weak. beci une osnulaenta Afrikaans daily newspaper lulal the SalCuUls contained more 'verbosity than content'.

The package will have no perceptible effect on imports South Africa according to Telegraph cor respondent Brussels Alan Osborne. 'Last year Britain bought some £27 million of iron and steel. Most of Britain's imports Africa fruit, vegetable minerals, and Mirs lhat cher has insisted that these remain untouched', wrote 16 September As the biggest foreign investor in South Africa be the most affected by the ban on new investment. 'But i prae ban is un goes on ban ls unlikely force changes in any major business plans.

← Reject Murdoch's new offerONLY THE LEFT CAN DEFEAT THATCHERISM Brital →

Something wrong on this page?