DEACE THROUGH ALIGNMENT | Socialist Action 1983

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 7-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

assures American protection in a major war.' But none of these arguments, correcuy out.

majority movement.

From this Lowe concludes that the main concern of the Labour leader ship is that 'withdrawal would have adverse elecLabour is cons toral for (his emphasis). he goes on to pon our, noon pills gate cause po nion polls give cause disputing the widely-held assumption that there is solid support for NATO among the electorate.

But it is in this part of Lowe's argumentation builds begins to break down. It would be totally false and dangerously mislead- to conclude that the abour leadership's com nitment to NATO stems very undermine withdrawal that it becoming increasingly the British labour movement to withdrawal from NATO, and thereby win such a policy at Labour rarty concicuice 1s not simply one of changing the leadership's perception of he popularity or such a policy although it is undoubtedly the case that any such campaign begin sponsored by the Campaign Group of Labour MPs is available price £1.50, from Verso, 6 Street, London WI.

SUBSCRIBE from NATO