SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Hanger strike

Socialist Action No. 154, 5 December 1986 · pp. 11-12 of the scan · 166 words

The scan: 154-dec-05-1986-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 11 of the scan

are stepping up the campaign for support They have forged links printers and their women's support organisation miners' behalf of the sacked workers Committee charges. This was the latest action in an anti-union campaign by the Murdoch-style management who broke agreements reached with national officers of the workers' unions. plemented impossible times on jobs.

representatives was endorsed by a ballot vote, with just 17 voting against.

Strike Appeal, London Road, Mitcham, 01-646 0260. THREE hundred workers at the artificial limb company of J.E. Hanger are in their eleventh week of dispute. Sacked by the firm in Roehampton, south-west London on 16 September the worers with the Wapping has had help and assistance from the Yorkshire suppoll group and Women against Murdoch. On Monday 1 December, Tony spoke at a successful public meeting on The dispute started when four members of the sacked trumped TASS and FTAT, and imThe immediate action in support of the four Wessex House, Surrey CR4 4YQ Tel:

page 12 of the scan

ACTION

← Fund drive Support our €10,000 publication fundDefend Knowsley North CLP against disbandment →

Something wrong on this page?