SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

TUC shows the need for minority movement

Socialist Action No. 25, 16 September 1983 · p. 6 of the scan · 221 words

The scan: 025-sep-16-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

AST WEEK'S TUC was reeted by the edia with something akin to aphoria. They welcomed the ght and sound of Chapple 3 he came to the fore and set se pace for Murray and the ther right-wing leaders.

They read the writing on TUC's wall which talks with osening of the links with cognition of emocratically vernment' which means no Sitical strikes against antiade union legislation.

They relished the humiliaaltrIffs say •y Protection Pay Justice -for at nHs staffs!

Stealth Service union health unions conducted the most militant struggles capitalist Men their grip on the TUC.

spelt the whole Tebbit, the elected Minority Movement, look at Movement.

COHSE Socialist Action 16 September 1983 tion of the left whose policies clearly offer no way forward against the Tory attacks. The left has not just let Murray and company off the hook, but allowed them to strengthA stop has to be put to this process which threatens future of the labour movement. This week PAT HICKEY examines the role of both right and left inside the TUC and stresses the need for the building of a new whilst BOB PENNINGTON takes a the old Minority N weakening marked.

Photo: GM COOKSON million contrast, ment the unions. Did Frank thump him? Or did the 'left' just politely roll over when Chapple spoke?

← New protests in ChileChapple shows the way →

Something wrong on this page?