SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Kinnock puts it crudely

Socialist Action No. 28, 7 October 1983 · p. 5 of the scan · 331 words

The scan: 028-oct-07-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 5 of the scan

THIS weeks City Limits magazıne carries interviews with all the would-be leaders of the Labour Lucky Neil Kinnock, who won the competition, spoke out frankly about feminism home and in the Party Did Glenys and Neil Kinnock talk about feminism?' 'Glenys is aware of the vestiges of sexism in my vocabulary. She doesn't think I'm sexist, but she says I misrepresent myself if I'm not aware of the need not to bird, or i use for instance? 'He had read bits and pieces, mainly articles, women's therg. tion. Had it changed his ways as a man? Did he do any housework?' Honestly, I don't,' he conceded. Well, no, tell you what, I do things I TA clean the fridge maybe in the holidays. Glenys is full-time teacher, and I've spent years and years trying to persuade her somebody to help her, and for the last we've had a smashing woman come in four hours a week.

'That's a great help, mainly because it enables Glenys to spend more time with the kids, so that she doesn't come home to the wreckage at 4.30. But it took me years to persuade her.

*She has a reputation as being very acute politically. Has he ever discussed the possibility of her, rather than him, Neil Kinnock going in not real?

not really, hadn't. had he oman our the Party's feminist lobby. It might ve valuaole. provided wasn't thought Parat send done says says.

What he thought about the implications for benefits, taxation, housing.

"The women's sections and conferences, we suggest, are in transition, more and confident, and refining some of the policies that Kinnock was describing. The men pick up the atmosphere, but they don't do that work. What women are also asking for is that men change. women in the labout «What movement will distrust, he observes, 'is any effort to use the women's movement to tactical adinter-left power stan within the left-right 1o pur l cruael gles?' crudely but, do.'

← MALE NHS up for sale!Brent goose not yet cooked! →

Something wrong on this page?