ference to national conference — again hardly an excessive amount of time to ask for. All the more outrageous then that these resolutions were so resoundingly defeated. NEC.
She claimed that: 'Although have the correct policies we are seen as a Party dominated by men'. There are two inaccuracies in this. First, the Second, how can anybemoan the male domination of the Party with sincerity and then so rigorously oppose any steps which try to give women. facility (From Labour Briefing conference bulletin).
'AS PREDICTED women. But we almost won the forward for women in the Party win.
Pettifor, 39 Caldervale Road, A step was made towards this in the vote for the resolution for a rules which was defeated by only a narrow majority 01 3,000,000 3,134,000. Unions like the voted against composite calling for a rules conference for the women's organisation. This in itself is a tremendous step 'The WAC has been consistently calling tol the women's organisation to be democratised along the lines of the rest of the Party. We need your help if we are to continue this pressure and 'If you can help in our campaign, contact: Ann London SW4.
fight into the unions, especially unions like the NÜR the POEU which have a left leadership but whose position on women na ward at all. We must look Commiee must turn I attention to organising women at the base of the Labour Party itself and in has very few local affilia ColE pared to its national impaul.
In the unions we need to draw up model resolutions, organise fringe meetings conferences and promote rank and file organisation for women.
In addition, women ir the party must fight for the right policies on women. Women want power Party but not power in a vacuull demands only our campaigning energy will really mobilise women action. And this is the TUC DAY ост.
lifeblood of our movement — if only the Labour Parit would but understar d Competition