SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Lady Olga and the Bomb

Socialist Action No. 4, 8 April 1983 · p. 15 of the scan · 190 words

The scan: 004-apr-08-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 15 of the scan

Olga Maitland admitted: 'We are all Conservatives? AT LAST ordinary peohave taken up the issue with addresses in sW1, Wimbledon the proletarian heartlands of surrey goi launch Women for Defence.

Their leader, Olga Maitland, daughter Lord Lauderdale, Sunday Express columnist and would-be Tory MP knows the campaign nas a vit or a problem.

She admitted: •We are al... Conservatives.

Lady Maitland wants across to women. So being non-patronising she said: 'We are going to exone syllable what it is all about.

Unfortunately she did not explain in words or one synable tar sne and her mates are for nukes. Perhaps she now looking for suitable monosyllabic WOTUS justify us all getting incinerated.

BEING MISUNDERSTOOD is the inevitable lot of •Ene British copper We al know how hard the Wes Midlands police force has been irving to get close to the public.

Some cynical lefties might claim they. have been getting a little too close to people of late Mr James Davey after being very close to them died when his life support machine was turned off.

Then there was the 64-year man the

----- pull-quotes -----

policeman's lot

← FrameworkLabour's 'new hope': the new Social Contract →

Something wrong on this page?