SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

What means

Socialist Action No. 42, 27 January 1984 · p. 1 of the scan · 255 words

The scan: 042-jan-27-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 1 of the scan

ACTION TUC is entertaining the absurd of for the cur decided to circulate a new 28-page document called Stategy for the Future. Written -10 provide the theme for the preparation at the next TUC Congress in the autumn the document is another step towards 'business' unionism.

Although written by the 'bright' researchers on the staff the document bears the unmistakeable imprint of Len Murray. It is aimed at getting through at the level policies the organisational gains made by the right wing at last year's • The document calls workable compromises' between the claims of trade unionists and those of other groups. It explains 'the essence of accommodating industrial change through collective bargaining is the need for compromises reflecting both union objectives and those of the employers.' This and other sections of the document, are a barely disguised plea for an in. comes policy.

• Tipping its hat to past services from Labour governments the TUC document says: "While the role of Labour governments has been a major factor in achievement of trade union economic and social objectives, the basis of the current TUC involvement in government owes much to Churchill's war-time subsequent Conservative governments.' This opens the way to collaboration with the Tories on pay and redundancies.

• It then hastens to add that most trade unionists *have never been been on strike - well that certainly applies to Len Murray -but says when strikes do octhey not only hurt business and the community, they hurt the workers involved. These are words

← TUC PLAN FOR SURRENDERMODERN TIMES →

Something wrong on this page?