SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

The YTS trap

Socialist Action No. 44, 10 February 1984 · p. 11 of the scan · 203 words

The scan: 044-feb-10-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 11 of the scan

Graham Day has stated that his job is to sell off the When the Youth Training Scheme was introduced, the Tories claimed it was voluntary. This was a condition of TUC cooperation with the scheme.

Last year however the Department ment told careers officers inal tney must inion vi young people who refuse participate scheme. Supplementary unemployment benefits will be cut off from young people who 'repeatedly' turn down YTS offers.

In Sheffield around local government union members are refusing to cooperate with the of Employment in singling out young people for victimisation for refusal to paticipate in YTS schemes. Careers officers in Manchester and Scotland ar taking similar action.

The Department Employment declared las Thursday •that government worker relusing to carry out ll structions to finger youn people for withdrawal o benefits are acting illega ly.

The 2,500 strong stitute of Careers Officer which affiliated NALGO, has condemne the use or social securi cuts to force young peop refusing suppo NALGO members breal ing the law tọ comply wi government instructions Don Hayden, stitute's president, in e fect accepted the gover ment's ar argued, think mo careers officers will be ab to decide tor themselv what constitutes • unreasonable refusal'.

← Print union defies the courtDefy Tory rate laws! →

Something wrong on this page?