SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

ABORT CORRIE BILL NOWI

Socialist Action No. 48, 9 March 1984 · p. 8 of the scan · 180 words

The scan: 048-mar-09-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 7-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

Dat C COOKSON The evidence of continued attacks, with the growing organisational strength of the anti-abortion organisations, did not prevent divisions within NAC between unose woo wanled lo lake up all the issues around women's fertility and to be women-only organisa tion, and those who saw the continued danger anti-abortion attacks in and out of parliament and necessitv of culilcll trating on abortion.

The conflicting Jente a split, Reproductive Kignls Campaign was SC up at the end of last yeal NAC has never rOWCVCI ignored abortion-related The difference betISSUCS ween the two organisations is likely to be bettheir methods banalslll The split in NAC is to be regretted. But it did end over two years of internal dissention, and has led to a new burst or cuunuslasll It is important now that the LWU groups learn ic otherwise would lend comfort to the forces ranged against us. If une at -aoorosl ceed because of divisions the pro-choice camp the movement wil no1 easily forgive those who cause such diviSOHS

----- pull-quotes -----

Split trends in NAC have finaly

← NAC:"All that is brave and good ... is in prison" →

Something wrong on this page?