SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Chosen

Socialist Action No. 49, 16 March 1984 · p. 12 of the scan · 186 words

The scan: 049-mar-16-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 7-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 12 of the scan

The waiting unti aile the missiles had been installed, and on the verge of becoming operational before making their decisive move. They hope that demoralisation among the women themselves, and a of resignation amonginel SUDDUTLCIS nationally, , will lead to an eventual decision to abandon the camps.

Obviously there is a limit to the endurance of the women put in an Im possible position by constant harassment.

major effort therefore needed to ensure that the camp Slay place. The Greenham came role l‹ gigantic amount of effort and sacrifice, and it would be a gigantic propaganda mup for the tones losop While there still some shelters the women are expecting inese to De any time. Therefore they are asking for people to provide them with Gortex survival bags, heavy duty polythene sheets, candles basic survival.

1 her are also asking for as women possible to go down there, hall. if only for a short time. perhaps a weekend couple or tree days. Ine track the launch perice it to be prepared makes another sortie • ror further information, contact the Greenham office 01-833 2831.

← EXPRESS Battling Bob's one-man standVICTORY TOTHE MINERS →

Something wrong on this page?