SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Ireland and partition

Socialist Action No. 5, 16 April 1983 · p. 10 of the scan · 255 words

The scan: 005-apr-16-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

YOUR editorial about Ireland titled 'The legacy of partition' (SA 1 April) deserves comment.

You state that a nationalist victory in Ireland would 'remove the Loyalist reactionary bloc and open up the way for a socialist Ireland on. Britain's doorstep' Surely, socialists, our first duty is to unite the To label a workine Cass. large section of the Irish "reac tionary Loyalists' can do no good to the cause of a united and even less to the cause of socialism.

Socialists should seek to unite the Irish working class, Catholic and ProtesLaTE As long as there is sectana votence une and the working class will remain divided and as long as the Irish working class divided united socialst ireland Is a utopian dream.

TIM PORTEUS, Edinburgh. The Loyalist general strike in 1974. Working class unity has to confront problem of Loyalist ascendency balale trom those of the working class, actending Its ln terests it only incidentally The possession of nuclear weapons should be the light LU. which they contribute to Soviet Union can only be guaranteed by the overthrow of both imperialism the aster es bureaucracy. The latter not subordinate to the former but part of the same process.

The Soviet bureaucracy maintains its rigid control through a fundamental character.

Socialist Action does not necessarily support the demands of the indepen dent Peace Group but supports its right to exist free of harassment SUISCISSOR CE an activity around Soviet foreign which apparently has become a taboo sub.

ect for the WRP, can onl

← Tribune's call to armsNewsline on Soviet Union →

Something wrong on this page?