Sün Members of all The Sun production chapels refused

Socialist Action No. 58, 18 May 1984 · p. 4 of the scan · 121 words

The scan: 058-may-18-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 4 of the scan

Sam's to handle the story. The Sun has without either.

Printworkers refused to print the Sun's 'Mine Fuehrer' picture of Scargill last Monday Observer case were mentioned.

When the NUJ chapel voted not to handle the copy 'under threat', even though they recognised the right of reply as being jegulllalc. Lamb immediately abandoned the I Mav London edition. The Northern edition had a blank centrespread with a note blaming the jourfor the nonappearance of any centre SLUI Y Since then events have 4. taken a bizarre twist. Having agreed a right of reply Scargill, Lord MatInews then insisted on vetting the content! When

----- pull-quotes -----

picture and major neadline on our lead

decided, reluctantly, to print the paper