SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

Misguided

Socialist Action No. 64, 29 June 1984 · p. 9 of the scan · 177 words

The scan: 064-jun-29-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

Barry's criticisms of Clause 4 are misguided because they that executive members who belong to Clause 4 meet, work. (or in some other way receive directions?) as a group. This does not happen and, in fact, a cursory exam ination of their voting would not suggest a coherent grouping.

Barry may disagree with politics of these comrades, but the majority of the EC would reject this auc D z C Susce oua bcoo t should bar themselves from office in CaDol movement organisation because of the views they hold, other organisations they belong to There are grounds for a broader ConCeru bership. It is largely composed of about EC's youngish, white, Hlalt cx-sluuclll. and, no doubt, this finds a reflection in its politics.

Dul lt s vartiy lli alial tempt to widen the LCC's base thai the Labour and Unions Charter has been prioritised, and why the annual meeting adopted constitutional changes that will aramancaly crease the representation of women the Executive.

wuetel responses are adequate, or not, they show a recognition of current weaknesses.

← By Geoff HodgsonClass struggle →

Something wrong on this page?