Voting for black sections | Socialist Action 1983

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

relationship between the general women's Hirschfeld wrote in 1902 that renal lave become an almost indispensible and prominent component of all our events.

But the only major I WAS somewhat surprised by your report in last week's Socialist Action (12 October that the delegate from Hampstead Highgate CLP to party conference was opposed to black sections.

As the delegate I can only say that I actively supported the CLP's motion on black sections when it was first raised at my branch and at the general committee and voted for both composites at When I stood in the elections to be the CLP with the full backing of the local Briefing group, I stated that the issue of black sections would be a crucal devale al conference and I would support the CLP's position in favour of establishing black SCLEOIS.

Socialist Action frequently gives a clear perspective on struggles both inside and outside the Labour Party. It is a pity that its reporting on this issue is not of the same standard.

I would appreciate it if you would put the Hampstead and Highgate CLP • Many apologies for this error. It is true we accepted the information given to us voting without verifying true i was accuraic.