SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

ONLY THE RIVERS RUN FREE NORTHERN IRELAND: THE WOMEN'S WAR

Socialist Action No. 76, 2 November 1984 · pp. 9-10 of the scan · 300 words

The scan: 076-nov-02-1984-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

denominator.' The of the continued by the military, be ig nored: tition structured in haven't in They work to get rid of them, not just ignore them.

to be an! more part of the South as a woman, the way it stands at the minute, than Paisley would. But that doesn' stop me saying I'm Republican well as socialist and a feminist.' If people reading this begin to understand this relationship between republicanism feminism it will have taught them a great deal. Only the rivers run free: Northern Ireland, the women's war Eileen Fairweather, Roisin McDonough and Melanie viacr auycal fluro rress cratic demands by denouncing. them, cocal 'diversion'. fashion, Underlying these views is an assessment of the nation state will perhaps be startling many socialists.

Minnerup conclude:

"rar the dark source of most modern evil, the nation state actually represents the pinnacle of human achieve. ment in the field of emancipation.' that nation state is 'out-modea as a lailas. of liberal cosmopolitanism. asoccu the strainetoroardis appears straighttorward flicts between states are in reality no: conflicts between states at all, but conflicts between specific social ana class interests using those states for their purposes.

But the second is more sharply posed: 'The problem is not that our organisation has lagged behind our social but that our economic social and progress economic orcallisallulls remained behind our political progress.

This certainly rather paradoxical way to pose things, and embodies a rather different emphasis to the traditional Marxist argument that the growth the productive forces has 'outgrown' capitalist social relations, and with that, the fetters of the capitalist state. But it does highlight that well after any socialist transition, even in wide sectors of the

page 10 of the scan

Socialist Action 2 November 1984

----- pull-quotes -----

Liberal The nation state el

← Socialists and nationalistsSTUDENTS Ultra vires - students, the miners and →

Something wrong on this page?