SocialistAction 1983–88

The paper of the Socialist League, formerly the International Marxist Group, 1983–88

States of America.'

Socialist Action No. 33, 11 November 1983 · p. 9 of the scan · 600 words

The scan: 033-nov-11-1983-SA-UK.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

Almost identical remarks were to be nade many years later when Francis Prm announced that Polaris had been #puaicu al a cost of £1000 million ander Operation Cheveline and he said to Jim Callaghan: 'I want to conaratulate the leader of the opposition for having carried out this policy'. Jim Callaghan said: 'Well of course we were only carrying out Conservative policy as well' he was shouted down pecause it sonded slightly weak.

Churchill also said: 'As for the cost, have said before as an old parliamenarian. that 1 was rather astonished thai well over f100 million should dispersed or parta mast made aware was a astonished'. Our policy of subordinaion to the US has been demonstrated over and over again. I need hardly remind you of the cruel memory Michael Stewart and Harold Wilson and their attitude towards the United States in Vietnam. Even when But if you lie about the 'unimportant' matters: cruise missiles, nuclear weapons, Hass cx ermuauor the establishment will bless you, and say that you're statesmen. The fact that you lie, yUU cheat. that vou template the mass extermination of people as part of international policy is praised. The agreement under which cruise is being brought to this country was reached in 1931.

Even if you accept that cruise is necessav. ao con't. wherner vol have dual, triple or quadruple keys the agreement reached in 1951 is wholly inadequate the being sophisticated press button technology DIt that cruise represents. The 1951 agree.

ment for the US to use certain bases in this country was tor aeroplanes to refuel, followed subseof quently by jet aeroplanes to refuel, and maybe have maintenance. nothing to do with pressing buttons thẹ which provide instantaneous mass extion there was a new government, the thing was pushed to one side and Churchill eagerly took it over, picked it up and accepted it. Tiny - well government on democratic encugh. I wonder why they never say this about Haiti, where there has been repression and poverty for year after year after year. As long as they have a reactionary lick-spittle government support exploitation and private enterprise, that government Dacking from the America. Cruise means that we shall be Not by ucacal country ( decree.

America now decides that a tiny a tinv island isn't Merlyn Agee's deportation countries like prepared to can rely on United States of closely to American

Tories. So we've

remember that the policy of exposing within our own has met with hostility by Labour governments and by Conservative governments to an even greater During that period, when the CIA wanted a victim, then we provided it Rees defended Phillip man should have been knighted for his exposures of the CIA. That was the sort of thing that was sustained by the Labour government, and it could have done a great deal more. What else could it have done? It could have introduced a freedom of information bill. close and meaningful discussions with their comrades in the constituencies We have a leadership system that was so revolutionary that those who had used the Party to get wealth and power decided it was too radical for them and they must leave.

Our leader is now elected on a wider basis and it gives us in the Party a greater right to expect the leader to carry out Party policy. And it breaks down that insulation which has been the salvation of the establishment for so long between the PLP and the rank and file. The position which Clem Atlee OuEHOCO n 1945 is no longer SUS tainable.

← Lewis Davies Memorial LectureChange →

Something wrong on this page?